Context
-
Crown corporation with annual revenues of $300M+
-
Significant trade enabler and economic driver for the Canadian economy
-
Various active stakeholders represented on the board with competing agendas
The Issues
-
The HR Committee was struggling to balance the organization’s social and commercial agendas
-
The pay philosophy was not reflective of the complexity of the organization and executive roles
-
The HR Committee noted a disconnect between pay and performance – particularly for executives
Our Mandate
Revisit the pay philosophy
- Conducted interviews to articulate and document various Board members’ visions of the organization
- Supported the Board to align on a common vision and market positioning – i.e. devised a pay philosophy within a spectrum that ranged from “Branch of Government” to “Commercial Organization”
- Conducted a full diagnostic of the current pay program, peer practices and regulatory environment to determine “what to fix”
- Included overview of peer practices, pay levels and structure, performance sector, performance assessment process and scorecards
- Determined and documented the revised pay philosophy – key success factors included:
- Increased pay and performance linkage – through compensation mix (i.e. more “at risk”) and better performance metrics
- Targets that were more difficult to achieve
- Clear guidelines for long-term performance
Determine pay peer group and benchmarking approach
- Using a consensus-based approach, worked to define the peer group selection approach – while maintaining a balance between public and private sector peers
- Public sector: Selected the most relevant 17 public sector organization based on the refreshed pay philosophy
- Private sectors: Filter through 120+ publicly traded organizations to identify the most relevant 14 organizations, including:
- Similar international organization (based in UK, US, Australia)
- Similar sized organizations (based on top and bottom line)
- Canadian organization with similar operations or participating in the supply chain
- Captured benchmarking data and illustrated current positioning and “market-pay gaps” by roles
- Sourced private the best available survey data and integrated the data to the other benchmarking data to complement some executive roles
Design new compensation framework
- Redesigned the short-term incentive program, including:
- Review of the corporate scorecard
- Inclusion and definition of individual performance
- Designed a new long-term incentive program and supported the HR Committee in the selection of the best long -term performance measures, aligning with their corporate strategy rework.
- Modelled the executive compensation outcomes under diverse performance scenarios
- Supported the Committee in determining the best transition strategy
- Reviewed and drafted compensation disclosure
Review and draft executive contracts term sheets and benefits transition
- Reviewed and commented on executive employment agreements and legacy incentive programs
- Prepared individual executive term sheets and incentive programs term sheets
- Bridged external experts (actuaries) with the Committee and initiated creative solutions specific complex cases of benefits transition
- Reviewed and drafted compensation disclosure